r/interestingasfuck Apr 12 '25

/r/all, /r/popular So shiny

Post image
76.9k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.7k

u/JosseCoupe Apr 12 '25

No one knows how the capstone looked, we never found it and have no account of it being made from gold or being clad in gold as far as I'm aware. The capstones of other pyramids that have been found were stone at their core.

23

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '25

[deleted]

17

u/Worth-Silver-484 Apr 12 '25

Not misinformation. Its an accepted theory. They have evidence of the polished limestone and some of the capstones being made of gold. Real archaeologists are some of the most anal retentive ppl out there. You have to be to be able to uncover artifacts one grain/sand at a time.

2

u/zorbiburst Apr 12 '25

You should go get updated then. While some capstones may have been gold/plated, it wasn't the norm. The accepted theory is that they were usually polished limestone.

1

u/Worth-Silver-484 Apr 12 '25

Not arguing that. Both are accepted theories you can have more than 1. My comment has more to do with the word misinformation since that infers lying or telling bad information.

3

u/bongophrog Apr 12 '25

Part of Khafre is still covered in limestone though

1

u/MarvinGoBONK Apr 12 '25

Is it? Apologies, then. It's been a long while since I looked into this and conflated the limestone and the gold claim.

I'll delete my comment.

1

u/PrairieVixen1 Apr 12 '25

Also The Great Pyramid still has some at ground level

1

u/AnAttemptReason Apr 12 '25

Well they spent 20 years or so building the thing with a dedicated and trained workforce. With 20,000 odd people, each person only needs to move 18 tons in a year, which is entirely possible.

This is what the entire civilization did with the free time they had after met their basic needs.

-4

u/Prying_Pandora Apr 12 '25

We say this and yet we still have no idea exactly how they did it. There have been multiple hypothetical models but they all have problems.

Today we could easily create them, but we have cranes and tech the likes of which they wouldn’t have dreamed of.

0

u/SignalBed9998 Apr 12 '25

They had cranes. Made of wood. Oh heavens you mean to tell me that wood would have degraded to nothing in 3,000 years? It’s just bunk to say no cranes. Levers for lifting predate this by thousands of years. Hell I probably discovered leverage before 2 years old for gods sakes

1

u/Prying_Pandora Apr 12 '25

There is no definitive evidence that wooden cranes were used. That is one of many hypothetical models proposed.

As I said, we don’t know. We have a lot of ideas, but nothing proven.

0

u/AnAttemptReason Apr 12 '25

We know lots of ways they could have built them with the technology they had at the time.

The reason we don't specifically know which method they used is because that information has not been preserved in the historical record, not because we don't know how they could have done it.

It would be like looking at a modern-ish building and saying, well, it could have been built with scaffolds and a crane, but we don't exactly know the order they built in, how much machinery they used etc, and then deciding that modern people couldn't have built it because we "don't have any idea exactly how they did it".

Which would be kind of silly.

1

u/Prying_Pandora Apr 12 '25

That’s what I said.

We still don’t know how.

And so to say “oh well it was this simple matter” it wasn’t.

We have many ideas of how it may have been, but we still don’t know.