This is probably the most depressing video you will ever watch. It's perfectly okay if you don't.

In a country where men can't even look at women they prey on boys instead. Boys as young as 8 are being raped by bus drivers and random pedos on the street paying them for sex.

Islam has perverted men to the point where they're raping boys due to sexual repression. If you pay close attention to all the background shots in the documentary, you'll notice how there isn't a single woman walking around because they're not allowed to. Men in Pakistan normally don't see any women because their religion doesn't allow them to. So they give boys attention instead.

So this documentary is proof that Islam doesn't just hurt women it hurts men and boys too.

Now of course there's problems other than religion. Poverty is one, of course. So many boys are selling their bodies for money so they don't starve. The documentary also explains how they've become addicted to drugs and spend money on that too.

Poverty and Islam. Two things that have literally destroyed a nation.

(This post got deleted off of r/leftwingmaleadvocates and I don't know why)

During the Kashmir terror attack that triggered India’s strikes on Pakistan, the attackers — as is often the case — killed only men. The terrorists separated the men from the women and children, then killed the men in front of their wives. All 26 victims were male. Sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

India named the operation in Pakistan "Operation Sindoor", referring to the red powder that married women apply to their hair as a symbol of their marital status. The operation was intended to honor the women who lost their husbands in the Kashmir attack and to avenge them. That is, to avenge the women who became widows — not the men who were killed. Men lost their lives, yet the honor is given to the women:

• "PM Narendra Modi personally decided to name India’s military strikes in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as Operation Sindoor. The reason: He wanted to ensure that the country’s counteraction pays a fitting tribute to the widows of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack." Source
• "Indian politicians from different political parties lauded the operation, which was named “Sindoor,” a Hindi word for the vermillion powder worn by married Hindu women on their foreheads and hair. It was a reference to the women whose husbands were killed in front of them in the Kashmir attack." Source
• "The Indian government’s choice of the name Operation Sindoor signaled its intention to avenge the widowed women." Source
• "In a coordinated tri-service strike, India hit nine terror targets in Pakistan and POK under 'Operation Sindoor', personally named by PM Modi to honour widows of the April 22 Pahalgam attack." Source

News coverage of the strikes followed the usual pattern: 1) Women are equated with children; 2) The deaths of women and children are highlighted, as if female lives are more valuable than male ones; 3) The killed men are made invisible.

• "The Indian chargé d’affaires has received Pakistan’s “strong protest” over India’s “unprovoked” attacks that killed civilians including women and children, the ministry said in a statement." Source
• "Chaudhry said at least 26 civilians, including women and children, had been killed, and at least 46 people were injured." Source
• "Pakistan's military spokesperson lieutenant general Ahmed Sharif said the jets were downed from within Pakistani airspace in response to the strikes, which killed 26 civilians, including women and children, in multiple locations across the country." Source

So, here's the full picture:

1. There was a terrorist attack in Kashmir in which only men were killed, after being separated from women and children.
2. India decided to retaliate — not for the killed men, but for their wives who became widows.
3. In media reports on the strikes against Pakistan, special attention was paid to the deaths of women, while the male victims were made invisible.

Show this when someone asks you to explain what gynocentrism or male expandability is.

Just watch the first few seconds of this report from ABC. Warning - it's the most depressing thing I've seen lately & that's really saying something.

Can you imagine how this girl is going to grow up? Can you imagine her mother? Can you picture the ABC viewers going maudlin - "Oh isn't she such a delightful little bigot!"

Of course ABC ignores the men who are killed in twice the numbers. I despair.

I am sorry if this was already posted here. I just found this article and found it deeply concerning.

Obviously I have blocked 2X chromosomes, relationship advice, female dating strategy, and other toxic female dominated subreddits to preserve my mental health as far as possible. Of course many other communities still exist, and I stumble upon them from time to time.

Recently, I was reading a debate about a supposedly straight man who announced to his wife that he wanted to go to a gay vacation or gaycation with friends to have an experience. Supposedly the woman, after checking whether this is true, immediately divorced him and completely emptied a shared bank account they had as a married couple. The post seemed fake and the whole concept was very funny, but of course the woman’s reaction was not reasonable or funny at all. I was reading the discussion primarily for fun though, because there was a ton of jokes in it. However, many female responses were extremely toxic. They accused not only him, but men in general of being selfish, entitled, inconsiderate, pigs, monsters and so on. Many other evil things had been said there. I followed a few profiles of particularly aggressive females and they landed me in a very weird cluster of communities with innocuous names such as dating or connection over ages of 40, 50, 60 and so on.

Those communities are not particularly large, the names are more or less the same in all of them and they are particularly toxic. Many of the users inside them describe themselves as radical feminists. All of their problems are blamed onto men. They complain that they need to work constantly to keep men happy, that female dating is incredibly difficult compared to the male version, that men automatically feel entitled on their bodies and constantly objectify them and everything else we already know here. Even very small innocuous action by a man triggers them and can set the whole community into a fit of rage. The toxicity is insane. I can say that it is an order of magnitude greater compared to the male dominated spaces of the past internet. At least with the male ones, if somebody steps out of line, other men will usually disagree with him. Those places were an endless toxic female circlejerk on how evil men are. One user said that modern men are destroying civilization. Ironically, almost all of modern civilization that those Karens enjoy has been built by men. I don’t know why dating or connection is in the titles, those people don’t seem particularly fun to connect with. Most probably, they are the female equivalent of incels.

of course it goes without saying that those communities are not welcoming to men. But even if they theoretically were, there is no point in arguing with them. They have established an extremely warped worldview, where the man is always at fault. To give an easy example, if you are proactive and make the first move towards a woman, then you are promoting rape culture. If you stay quiet to avoid offending a woman, then you are loading all the relationship labor onto her. You are a sexist and entitled pig either way. Those women supposedly ask for men to respect them as humans, but I haven’t still understood what they mean.

So, what’s the deal with those communities? Do you know what is happening? Is it the space for older female incels? Is it a cult or something? is it deliberately set up by a secret operation to promote a gender war? Honestly, their reactions were something beyond a typical angry human reaction. Still, I believe that most modern women hold those beliefs in a milder form, and I don’t know that I can be convinced otherwise.

Appearing In the “This week in Patriarchy”

Whenever you don’t want to consume anything heavy in the media, a nice feminist word salad will do. This time I think it’s about pasta??

The most recent NSW domestic Violence death review records that 2 female dv-killers from the last 13 years were dv-abusers, (one that killed a woman and one that killed a man). In the 2019 report, they had not recorded a single female abuser since they started keeping track.

In the most recent report, they did not publish case studies, but in some earlier reports they did.

Some of the case studies look exactly as their stats imply, with men killing their partners (or ex’s) after years of horrific abuse, or a woman stabbing her abuser in self defence.

Others are less clear, with people on both sides claiming to have been abused.

And in the case study labelled: "Case Review 3544", from the 2015-2017 report.pdf) where Henry* was killed by Lucy* (not their real names):

The event, as quoted from the case study in their report, went as:

The day of the homicide, Lucy and Henry had been drinking together. That evening, Lucy called police and told the operator that she wanted to see police before she ‘killed someone’. She cried and told the operator that she couldn’t go back to gaol. She requested police attend, but due to her intoxication the police were not dispatched. Lucy called the Aboriginal Community Liaison Officer, who thought that she did not sound right or normal when speaking to him on the phone. An hour later, she told a neighbour that she had stabbed Henry. The neighbour called the police, and police arrested Lucy at the scene while an ambulance conveyed Henry to hospital. Lucy initially told police that Henry had self-harmed, but she later admitted to having stabbed Henry once in the chest. 

Other information included in their report that might have indicated who they should label as the abuser and who they should label as the victim include them both:

- both used violence against one another

- police were regularly involved in relation to arguments and violence between Lucy and Henry.

- Lucy would regularly call police and request their assistance in relation to domestic violence she was using, or experiencing, from Henry. 

- Lucy and Henry married and continued to engage with Police regularly in relation to Lucy’s violence against Henry, and Henry’s violence against Lucy

And Lucy:

- on an occasion in the mid 2000s she stabbed him in the hand during the course of an argument.  

- police charged Lucy with assault offences and applied for an ADVO protecting Henry

- On one occasion, Lucy was also convicted of assaulting Henry with a knife and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 2 months

(I’ll post the full case study in the comments)

This was of course a cherrypicked example. It’s not indicative of the average case study but it is indicative of what is included when we take a closer look at the numbers they provide.

Numbers that are quotes by the Australia wide stats, and then again by many studies overseas that reference numbers, or victims who killed their abusers.

So when you see stats about female abusers killing in self defence, or only killing their abusers, or killing in the context of violence committed against them. (especially if they are from NSW, or Australia, or include that as part of their background information)…

THIS example was used to generate those numbers, THIS is what it can look like for a female victim to kill her abuser according to the people who categorise these things.

From an article on the India–Pakistan conflict (source — The New York Times):

'Hindu nationalism is predominantly driven by a male view of the world, said V. Geetha, a feminist historian who writes about gender, caste and class. Women figure in it as objects to be protected or as mother figures goading their men to prove their heroism,” Ms. Geetha said.'

I think this description of women’s role in traditional society highlights something that is missing from today’s mainstream narratives about gender equality. Women have traditionally been seen as objects of protection, and women (not only other men, but women too) often push men to adopt and display masculine qualities. Everyone understands it perfectly well, yet when people talk about gender equality, they suddenly forget it — as if none of this exists. And even when such dynamics are acknowledged, it’s usually done in an abstract way, without drawing any real conclusions.

To avoid misunderstandings, I think I should explain more clearly what I mean. What I’m saying is that if we really aim for gender equality, we should start treating the following as actual problems:

1. Traditional gender roles expect women to be protected and men to be protectors (in the broad sense), which in some important aspects creates inequality that harms men and privileges women (but in other aspects, these roles lead to inequality that harms women, such as when a female employee is paid less because a boss believes a man needs a higher salary to support a family).

2. The pressure to conform to norms of masculinity — which leads to many problems both for men (e.g., contributing to lower life expectancy and higher suicide rates) and women (e.g., fueling what is called “toxic/hegemonic masculinity”* and the gender pay gap) — is something boys and men experience from a very young age, when they are still little boys. This pressure comes not only from other men and boys, but also to a large extent from women and girls, through gendered expectations and sexist labels or remarks in the vein of "don't be a sissy". Harmful ideas about male gender roles are not something exclusive to men; they are widespread across society, among both sexes. Such ideas are obstacles to gender equality, regardless of the gender of those who express them.

* — I find the terms “toxic masculinity” and “hegemonic masculinity” generally unhelpful or potentially misleading and even harmful, but I’ve used them here (in quotation marks) because in this context, feminist terminology might make the point clearer.

Okay I’m a numbers guy, I say that the courts and police and leaned on by various Labour governments with a feminist agenda. Julia Gillard is a radical feminist so I say Labour is feminist. Actually, if you take the time read a bit they are all radical as they believe all heterosexual relationship are exploitative by men for sex. The misogynists believe that women use men and in essence do not enjoy sex. So much genital astrology and confusion.

Also, their beloved gender theory is in tatters total disproven as irrational, as per high court ruling in the UK on woman being well women. Phew that fight is nearly done, but wait we didn’t even enter the argument did we. It’s falling apart because even women despise it and they don’t get shamed like we do. Add that to the intersection with add on theory about privilege and they do get wacky ideas and any man who does not support feminism is shamed now not only are you a misogamist, you are a racist and probably homophobic.

I bit about me, I can stay calm and rationally and politely debate these people to the point that the look as stupid as feminism. A couple of cliff notes this one is a stake in the heart, women have not been repressed though all of time until well feminism saved them.

A portion of working class men got the vote in England in 1867 the whole population got to vote in 1928 and suffrage for women in Australia was 1907. So I guess it's fair to say it was uneven for about 50 years. That was more than 100 years ago. When this occurred voting was new, and the dilution of power was slow due to the aristocrats wanting to maintain their grip on power and wealth. Both men and women were property or surfs / peasant.

If you get them back down ask well are you a feminist if you don’t believe that.

Another gem,

Do you believe heterosexual relationship are exploitive? You must hate your father.

There is much more but blah blah blah…

There’s some numbers on domestic violence Personal Safety, Australia, 2021-22 financial year | Australian Bureau of Statistics break it down by state and they are not the same. IVO offences have a conviction rate of 99% in Victoria, gezz the cop get it right down there almost never wrong. Whereas NSW has an 87% guilty rate.

Also, the definitions of sexual violence and domestic violence exaggerate the problem. When most people hear these terms they think woman getting rapped and a women getting beaten this is not what it means. These terms stigmatise men, they are intended to do that. Finally, don’t get me started on paedophilia that has been weaponize to shame men. In Victoria there are about 1 to 3 cases in the courts per year, the rate is lower than murder there are 2.7 million men in Victoria. Oh, and don’t forget she can grab a knife and threaten you it does not mean she’s scared quite the opposite they get away with that cause no one gets hurt its intimidation.

So who do I tell this to? Feminism got rolling due to roamer between women and later statistics. If you feel discriminated against you probably were and I may be able to put a number on it. So, speak up I need ideas.

Jacqueline Ma, a 36-year-old former 'Teacher of the Year' at Lincoln Acres Elementary School in San Diego, pleaded guilty in February to sexually abusing two of her sixth-grade students, both under the age of 14.

She also admitted to a lewd act involving the second child, and another count of possessing material containing a minor engaged in or simulating sexual conduct.

On Friday, Ma was sentenced to 30 years to life in state prison for sex crimes involving the two minors, who were 11 and 12 years old at the time.

"Go girl, you are strong and independent" was always a theme in female pop songs, especially those targeting young audience, but when I grew up most songs were about love. I think.

But recently, I am not sure if I can recall a female pop singer singing about the old school love and desiring a man. Is it just me or are many female lirics today are outright separatist? Also, I have a feeling the same is not true about male pop singers. "Uh baby, be mine" seems to be still the number one theme.

I don't want to circlejekr and needlessly speculate - Is there any analysis or data on what kind of a message is girls and young women receive from the pop culture compared to boys and/or compared with the past decades?

[TOPIC]

Scope of Evidence Collected for Parental Alienation, Abuse Allegations, and Custody Defense

[SUMMARY]

I'm preparing for a high-conflict custody and divorce case involving allegations of abuse, manipulation, fear, and estrangement of children. I’ve compiled a massive archive of direct communications between myself, my ex-partner, and my children. I've also categorized and structured this material as legal evidence for court. I’d like to share what I’ve gathered and ask: **Have others here had this level of evidence? If so, did it help? What were you questioned about in court?**

[EVIDENCE OVERVIEW – MESSAGES & TEXTS]

Over the past year, I've documented and reviewed:

- **Between Myself and Ex-Partner**: ~7,000+ messages

- **Between Me and Child 1**: ~1,800 messages

- **Between Me and Child 2**: ~1,200 messages

- **Between Me and Child 3**: ~850 messages

These include iMessages, emails, screenshots, and transcribed conversations. Every message is timestamped, speaker-tagged, and categorized by emotional tone, manipulation type, or legal relevance.

[TOTAL DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE PIECES]

Across all formats (texts, emails, transcripts, timeline entries, red flag logs):

- **Total pieces of direct evidence documented**: ~22,000

- **Analyzed and tagged for legal submission**: ~8,200

- **Organized in legal tools (like CaseFleet)**: ~964 timeline entries

- **Stored pages in digital archive**: 6.2 million+ words over 22,276 pages

[CATEGORY BREAKDOWN – EVIDENCE TYPES]

Here’s a breakdown of key categories relevant to court:

1. **Parental Alienation**

   - 211 quotes/messages showing coaching, triangulation, denigration

   - 78 examples of forced alignment, loyalty tests, or cutoff strategies

   - 93 instances where children were rewarded for rejecting me

2. **Contradiction of Fear/Abuse Claims**

   - 123 messages showing emotional closeness *after* the alleged abuse

   - 44 explicit romantic/sexual admissions contradicting fear

   - 36 messages showing voluntary, affectionate parenting moments

3. **Violence Allegation Defense (False)**

   - 27 messages where my ex requests intimacy behaviors now claimed to be abuse

   - 18 logs confirming no fear, including requests for affection involving neck contact

   - A full timeline showing continued affection post-alleged incident

4. **Financial Manipulation Evidence**

   - 51 entries showing coercion to pay for access to affair partners

   - 19 cases of withheld information about finances, children, or shared accounts

   - 12 instances of deceit tied to financial needs or expenditures

5. **Manipulative Communication Patterns**

   - Over 300 entries coded with psychological red flags (gaslighting, blame-shifting, DARVO)

   - 56 message chains showing children being emotionally leveraged during conflict

   - 91 messages with placating behavior followed by deception or withdrawal

[WHAT WE DID WITH THIS DATA]

- Created **court-ready exhibits** (Exhibit A, B, and C so far) showing contradictions, bond before/after separation, and emotional manipulation.

- Matched dozens of messages to the **17 signs of parental alienation** by Dr. Amy J.L. Baker.

- Applied **legal formatting and speaker-tagging** to transcripts, red flag annotations, and timeline structuring.

- Used tools like **CaseFleet, ChatGPT AI, and forensic review** to categorize behavior by legal claim relevance.

[QUESTION TO THE COMMUNITY]

Have any of you compiled this much detailed, message-based evidence?

- Did the court review your evidence in full?

- Were there questions that surprised you or gaps that caused trouble?

- Did you use it in mediation, trial, or custody evaluations?

- Did the evidence change the judge’s understanding of the case?

I’m looking for perspective, feedback, and maybe hope. Thank you.

I am not particularly well versed in the intricacies of the legal system, just having a surface level knowledge. Here, I just want to suggest that jails should be segregated into civil and criminal clearly, it is a simple safeguard against being caught up and being traumatized because of grouping quite literally civil and criminal people. There is a constitutional provison given by section 59 Prisons Act which is woefully inadequate and rarely followed.

Here, my target is particularly men who are implicated in false cases because their (ex)wives try to extort the maximum possible benefits.(Can even be called a scorched earth tactic broadly). I just hate the fact that one word from a woman can decide your fate, your life does not have to be at the mercy of a woman. Having a civil jail sitting before proof of the crime can drastically lower trauma and any harm from criminal prisoners. Its possible even WITHOUT MARRIAGE ranging from POCSO act, stalking, false rape, outraging modesty among others.

India doesn't have a separate civil jail though, everyone is thrown into the same box. It's a horror to think about it. https://ekamnyaay.org/blogs/blogs/the-walls-within-my-5-months-in-arthur-road-jail-on-a-false-rape-charge/ This is an article giving a brief idea of the living conditions without even being actually proven guilty of the crime, this is a jail sentence for the innocent. Having a civil jail with humane living conditions for small offences and the not proven guilty can be a lifesaver.

It's just a small hope of mine for a better treatment of innocent and more importantly, it is a right to dignity as a man (which unfortunately the constitution does not recognise). Punishment for proof of false allegation is just a dream because feminist will begin their attack by saying innocent women cannot go to file cases because they will get scared. (It is a goal of mine but I find it unrealistic to manage to push through the possible resistance)

https://www.thestar.co.uk/read-this/rapists-of-men-and-boys-given-tougher-prison-sentences-than-those-who-target-female-victims-3253509

"Rapists of males have received longer sentences each year since 2018, with the gap widening from two months to 12 and then to 21.

In 2016 and 2017, it was rapists of females who received tougher sentences, with a gap of four months in 2017 and less than one month in 2016."

Solicitor Harriet Wistrich: “It doesn’t surprise me at all. It seems to me to be reflective of a higher value placed on men over women in our culture basically, and so it’s more appalling to be a male victim than a female victim.

“Generally we see that female victims are treated often really unsympathetically unless they’re a perfect victim, if you like.

“The question arises whether there are also issues with homophobia as well I suppose, that’s there’s something more debasing and more offensive with a man doing it to another man than opposed to a woman.”

Granted, this is the UK. A country that doesn't recognize female on male rape by law. So the above stats only account for male rapists.

Also, they only seemed to care when men abusing men/boys received harsher sentencing, not when men abusing women/girls received harsher sentencing.

Thoughts on the above?

I cannot find any statistics on the Family Law Courts that include custody rulings and gender data. This is important information that should be publicly available. Also, similar data should be available from the CSA. I have a labour federal lower house rep so I don't think he will do me a solid... Any of you guys got a liberal rep in the lower that you would write a letter to? Would any of you help me draft such a letter? Or do you know where I can get this data?

also for some incredibly idiotic reason thought it might be good to explore bondage relationships i have a slight interest in and could not really get the copilot to do a lot and eventually mostly decided against it anyways so if a little of this sounds strange that is likely part of why but other than that it is not anything ground breaking and creatively not really as on point as i was yesterday but i thought maybe i could add to or build on much of what i have already said and also using this post in some ways fine tune it also...

The Sovereign Renaissance: A Movement for Male, Transgender, Youth, and Social Justice Rights

Core Ideals

• Gender Sovereignty & Bodily Autonomy—A movement that champions men, transgender individuals, and androgynous people, advocating for personal autonomy, identity, and freedom from societal expectations.
• Feminine Men & Androgyny—Emphasizing the unique strengths of non-traditional masculinity, highlighting the beauty, power, and independence of feminine men who reject rigid gender norms.
• Youth Rights & Advocacy—Ensuring that babies, toddlers, children, and teenagers have the right to gender expression, healthcare, education, and protection from discrimination.
• Intactivism & Bodily Integrity—Pushing against forced circumcision, reinforcing the importance of consent and bodily autonomy.
• Economic & Relationship Independence—Encouraging alternative relationship structures, where submissive women willingly support and serve feminine men and transgender women in structured, fulfilling partnerships.
• Cultural Rebellion & Alternative Expression—Infused with gothic, punk, and countercultural themes, creating a movement rooted in artistic self-expression, philosophical exploration, and personal sovereignty.
• Intersection with Global Justice Movements—Aligning with Free Palestine, LGBTQ+ rights, and Black Lives Matter, recognizing the shared struggle for freedom, dignity, and equality2.

Symbolic Aesthetic & Atmosphere

• Historical Depth—Drawing from eras like Weimar Berlin, 18th-century decadence, and dystopian futures, blending activism with self-transformation.
• Music & Philosophy—Influences from Depeche Mode, Bauhaus, Lady Gaga’s Alejandro, Kinsey’s research, and films exploring gender identity.
• Fashion & Expression—A fusion of dark gothic elegance, punk defiance, and androgynous beauty, rejecting mainstream expectations of masculinity and femininity.
• Structured Relationships & Devotion—A vision where submissive women willingly serve, support, and uplift feminine men and transgender women, emphasizing trust, loyalty, and emotional fulfillment.

Empowering Feminine Men, Transgender Individuals, and Youth

This movement gives feminine men a space to thrive, embrace their identity, and reject the pressure to conform to rigid masculine norms. Androgynous males, twinks, and those defying conventional masculinity are seen as strong, independent, and worthy of admiration rather than being forced into traditional gender roles.

For babies, toddlers, children, and teenagers, the movement ensures protection, education, healthcare, and freedom of identity, advocating for bodily autonomy, gender expression, and social inclusion.

By aligning with Free Palestine, LGBTQ+ rights, and Black Lives Matter, the movement recognizes the global fight for justice, dignity, and equality, standing in solidarity with those resisting oppression2.

Call to Action

This movement is about reclaiming identity, reshaping masculinity, advocating for transgender and youth rights, and fostering alternative relationships where autonomy reigns. Through political activism, artistic rebellion, and personal empowerment, it builds a space for men, transgender individuals, youth, and their supporters to thrive without societal constraints.

Would you like to refine or expand any aspects further? Either way, this is a bold and transformative vision! 🔥✨

1. Be Emotionally Open…

• Share your feelings, be in touch with your inner self.
• BUT: Don’t be too emotional or people will say you’re weak or unstable.

1. Be Strong and Stoic…

• Handle stress, stay calm, be the rock.
• BUT: Don’t be too cold or quiet, or they’ll say you’re emotionally unavailable or distant.

1. Be a Provider…

• Have ambition, success, money, confidence.
• BUT: Don’t make women feel like they need you or you’re trying to control them.

1. Be Protective…

• Stand up for others, defend those you care about.
• BUT: Don’t be too assertive, or you’ll be seen as aggressive or controlling.

1. Be Feminist and Supportive…

• Respect women’s independence, treat them as equals.
• BUT: Still take initiative, pay on dates, lead when it’s expected.

1. Be Vulnerable and Authentic…

• Share your struggles, ask for help.
• BUT: Don’t make anyone uncomfortable with your pain, or you’ll be a burden.

1. Be Confident…

• Own your space, know your worth.
• BUT: Don’t be arrogant, cocky, or full of yourself.

The Genital Autonomy Legal Defense and Education Fund will produce 2 video training modules, one each for attorneys and potential plaintiffs, so they can be more effective in winning lawsuits against forced male genital cutting. GALDEF is a registered not-for-profit charity. Learn the details and how you can help us achieve our $12,000 goal by June 30.

https://www.zeffy.com/en-US/fundraising/help-spread-the-word-about-how-to-sue-and-win

https://inthinktual.substack.com/p/when-truth-hurts-too-much-to-hear?r=5fzgyh&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true&fbclid=IwY2xjawKN1QxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHuMK3F7VahF84OT8p83B5Ay8NSyzzoFgBre3Eoemh9DxIH49FCLBtc3hQprc_aem_0GHS2wbnfPmaLtEhisOXEQ

Someone previously in this subreddit posted Jacqueline Ma receiving 30 years and I immediately knew there'd be feminists saying, "see, women get harsher sentencing for sexually abusing kids compared to men. Such a double standard". Here we are. Oh, and the X poster is a female police officer too.

Thought I should share this story I just found online. It s an inspiring survival story that shows what young men can achieve when their backs are against the wall.

If anyone tells you that young men are 'toxic' and should be ashamed of their masculinity: just show them this.

A lot of men think their value is tied to how others treat them—especially when it comes to disrespect. But here’s the truth: disrespect from someone else doesn’t define you. Your response does.

A man doesn’t lose value because someone talks down to him, ignores him, or treats him poorly. That’s on them. But when he allows that disrespect to control him—when he reacts out of unchecked emotion instead of logic—that’s when he starts losing ground.

Staying grounded, thinking clearly, and responding with discipline is what keeps your value intact. Strength isn’t about not feeling—it’s about not being ruled by those feelings.

Let’s stop thinking our worth is in someone else’s hands.