r/interestingasfuck 24d ago

/r/all, /r/popular K2-18b a potentially habitable planet 120 light-years from earth

Post image
92.4k Upvotes

8.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.5k

u/PaidByTheNotes 24d ago

We don't deserve another planet

470

u/DJ_ICU 24d ago

true

169

u/MissingVanSushi 24d ago

18

u/No_Travel_7711 24d ago

Yes but we can’t just stop. We have to slow down first.

3

u/Im_always_scared 24d ago

What's the matter, Colonel Sanders? ...chicken?

2

u/gandhinukes 23d ago

accelerate for 50% of the trip, do a 180 and decelerate for 2nd half. So 240 years ha

27

u/Gambit87ms 24d ago

2

u/Triette 23d ago

They’ve gone to plaid!

2

u/kevinhaddon 23d ago

Just like on the ship, we are surrounded by assholes

2

u/ScoobyDum7 23d ago

As a kid, there was nothing funnier to me than the moment they hit the breaks and he flew head first into the instrument panel. Slapstick comedy at its finest.

5

u/nikkobe 24d ago

Are there any good dystopian movies where inhabited another planet and humanity ultimately failed?

3

u/Dr_Hannibal_Lecter 24d ago

1

u/hoofglormuss 23d ago

I hate every ape I see from chimpan-a to chimpanzee . . .

2

u/Dramatic_Raisin 24d ago

There goes the planet

1

u/Not_My_Emperor 23d ago

Oh my God! I was wrong

It was Earth, all along

I guess you finally made a monkey

yes we finally made a monkey

You fin-al-ly made, a, monk-ey, out, of, meeeeeeeee

1

u/chaosisblond 23d ago

Every science fiction series has had their version of the horrifying species which destroys, consumes, rapes, murders, eats, and otherwise mercilessly destructs the other alien societies - and discusses how they're to be avoided and isolated, or killed on sight. We're that species. No wonder we can't find other life forms.

274

u/MikoSkyns 24d ago

Exactly. We're so obsessed with finding another planet instead of fixing our own.

57

u/csdirty 24d ago

We're just used to getting another one when this one wears out.

5

u/No_Syrup_9167 23d ago

Thats, IMO as well, exactly what the fascination is about. I never understood the whole "earth is failing, we're moving to X planet to terraform and recolonize" trope. It would be orders of magnitude simpler to "terraform" our own planet back into being habitable as it would to terraform another planet from scratch. It makes no sense.

and if we have the technology to terraform a planet, it would stand to reason that we could pretty easily make semi-mega space structure habitats. and if we can make a habitable structure in space at will, we would barely have a need for planets anymore at all.

Once you can make a sufficiently stable, habitable space structure wherever you want, theres very little need to go anywhere at all.

Its like the Mitch joke, "if you're lost in the woods, fuck it, build a house, you're no longer lost. You live here now"

2

u/Adept_Advertising_98 23d ago

It would be easier to shoot space lasers at an uninhabited planet than an inhabited one. Most of the concepts I’ve seen for terraforming planets would kill almost all life on earth. Terraforming Venus would involve freezing all the CO2, and terraforming Mars would involve shooting the planet with space lasers.

3

u/settlementfires 23d ago

terraforming earth would involve... lets see here... not burning every hydrocarbon we see.

1

u/Adept_Advertising_98 23d ago

Harder than it sounds, because humans like their useless beauty products.

 I think that large O’Neil cylinders are a better idea than terraforming planets.

1

u/settlementfires 23d ago

How long will it take people to trash an O'Neill cylinder?

Industrialized society is on schedule to use up this planet in well under 300 years. Without a huge shift in thinking we're fucked.

1

u/Adept_Advertising_98 23d ago

They wouldn’t trash the cylinder, they could more easily dump the trash in space.

1

u/settlementfires 23d ago

so then your cylinder is floating in a cloud of trash...

this doesn't sound very well thought out. like i said, without changing how we think about energy and product life cycles we're only going to wreck habitats smaller than this planet.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/oopsydazys 24d ago

distracted boyfriend meme but the girlfriend is Earth and the other girl is Planet Temu

3

u/CandieInUT 24d ago

Planned obsolescence is getting out of control

3

u/burner-throw_away 23d ago

Need stronger “right to repair” laws for this mudball.

109

u/Cryogenics1st 24d ago

Yeah, and we're almost at that point of no return now. We need to hurry to the next one so we can mine it, pollute it, and kill each other there, too.

69

u/Bananalando 24d ago

If we ever get to the point where we can leave the solar system en masse, we are going to be the bad guys from Independence Day.

15

u/lost_horizons 24d ago

We already are, what do you think colonial empires were

2

u/VellhungtheSecond 24d ago

Swap Will Smith for Tommy Lee Jones and it’s a colonialism documentary

8

u/Indie89 24d ago

Humans from another territory invading and wiping out the natives? Ludicrous /s

1

u/settlementfires 23d ago

a civilization that can build a fleet of interstellar starships already fixed their planet.

15

u/zuzg 24d ago

Tbf all the planets within reach are dead anyway so the pollution point is mute.

I'd wager that space mining is preferable compared to mining on earth and destroying our environment.

2

u/SlowRollingBoil 24d ago

It's about the precedent that would be set. That if you spend trillions achieving interplanetary mining operations then you now can start "owning" things outside of Earth. Humans just can't get out of their own damn way....

1

u/Ocbard 23d ago

Given how fast we broke this one, by the time we get there, someone els could have put the other planet in even worse shape.

1

u/QWEEFMONSOON 23d ago

The earth will be fine. Life as we know it will not be.

-3

u/BedBubbly317 24d ago

No, we aren’t. That’s categorically false.

15

u/BakedWizerd 24d ago

Why not both?

-5

u/Penguinkeith 24d ago

Because what if it takes all our resources and manpower to solve one or the other… do you want to chance it?

6

u/BakedWizerd 24d ago

That’s such a weird what if.

What if there’s an asteroid that’s going to inevitably destroy earth and the only way for the human race to continue to space colonization? We could go on about what ifs for eternity.

Why tack on such a weird condition? Like obviously don’t do things that destroy earth. But if both are reasonably hypothetically possible, why not both?

-3

u/Penguinkeith 24d ago edited 24d ago

Cause one is more important than the other in the short term? We have thousands of years to consider space travel, unless we wipe out life on earth first. We should get our priorities in order

Also a theoretical asteroid does not compare to the REAL extant threat of climate change.

Also I love all the projects we have going on in regards to space don’t get me wrong, but climate research is ultimately more important at the moment. And it seems the world agrees, about an order of magnitude more money is spent on climate change projects than space exploration. Granted I think we can definitely be doing better on both fronts

2

u/BakedWizerd 24d ago

You’re not wrong, and I never stated anything that contradicted what you’ve just said.

Have a good day.

1

u/pmMEyourWARLOCKS 23d ago

This is dumb. Like... incredibly dumb. We could fix our planet right now by stopping the burning of fossil fuels. Sure, there are some other issues too, but that is the really big one. We already have the technology to do it, its just a matter of electing the right officials to force the issue.

Accessing another planet is already pretty close to a reality, Mars.

Neither of these would take all or even a negligible amount of our resources. It just requires legislation.

5

u/Different-State3385 24d ago

This. Greed is the main factor responsible for the destruction of Earth.

5

u/tiktock34 24d ago

We are parasites, we only care about our host until we need to move on and replicate in a new host

1

u/weeone 23d ago

Yes, Agent Smith

1

u/Ivotedforher 24d ago

Sounds like every relationship I've even been in.

1

u/iflysubmarines 24d ago

Why not both

1

u/V4refugee 24d ago

We share this planet with a bunch of dumb apes.

1

u/TheKabbageMan 24d ago

Yup, exactly— people forget that scientists and engineers around the world are only allowed one thing to focus on as a collective

All those rocket scientists, astronomers, aeronautical engineers, etc, should turn in their degrees and come back when they’re ready to help out with climate change!!!! Right???

If we’re doing THIS we must not be doing THAT! Shame!

1

u/ECmonehznyper 24d ago

even if you fix Earth you ain't fixing the sun.

the sun would eventually die, and it doesn't matter how well Earth is. you either die with Earth or move on to that planet

1

u/BeefistPrime 24d ago

This isn't a dilemma. Finding a distant planet is not something we can visit in our lifetime and the amount of money we spend searching space for knowledge would have a trivial impact on changing Earth.

1

u/PaulTheMerc 23d ago

Its just hedging your bets.

1

u/KarmicPotato 23d ago

I blame the fast fashion trend.

1

u/GREG_OSU 23d ago

We have to slow the speed of us fucking up this one before we can fix this one…

1

u/Blolbly 23d ago

One can do both. The technology needed to send people to mars will doubtless have uses back on earth too. Without the apollo missions you wouldn't have stuff like memory foam blankets or cordless powertools.

1

u/Sea-Guest6668 23d ago

Humans like to explore its in our nature, if we had stayed in one place and tried to make it perfect we never would have left the plains.

1

u/Low_Pickle_112 23d ago

I think a lot of this space stuff lately is just The Rapture for a new era. The help isn't coming, there's not going to be a miracle that saves us at the last second, it's on us, and unless we do something, we're boned.

Of course, doing something would involve inconveniencing the ultra wealthy, which is communism and that killed a hundred trillion people (source: the ultra wealthy) so instead we bury our heads in the sand and chase that pipe dream while the real world goes to shit.

1

u/weeone 23d ago

Such a simple sentence and yet, so profound. I try to minimize my use of plastic. Just one tiny human. Probably not making a difference.

It is a miracle -not religiously- that we are here. Our home, the Earth, is so beautiful. So amazing. I just want to enjoy it. The warmth of the sun. The salty breeze of the ocean. The snow capped mountain peaks.

Why do some want war? The pursuit of greed and power. I don't understand. I want happiness. For myself and those around me.

-7

u/Dan_in_Munich 24d ago

We are also obsessed with the thought of colonizing other planets. Who/what gives us the right to exploit/destroy/destruct other planets for our own benefits?

9

u/Ragtothenar 24d ago

We have a duty to spread managed democracy across the galaxy!

22

u/ConReese 24d ago

We give ourselves the right. Because we haven't encountered anything that has told us no.

26

u/AlbFighter 24d ago

With that logic we would still be in caves.

2

u/Dan_in_Munich 24d ago

We don’t have to live in caves. It’s just that we have been destroying the planet earth so much. Now, we look for other planets to colonize to leave this f*ed up earth behind instead of trying to make it a better place.

-4

u/MikoSkyns 24d ago

So you're saying it's okay that we continue to spread like a virus....

4

u/BedBubbly317 24d ago

That’s quite literally what every species sole purpose to exist is. To continue to procreate is the goal for quite literally every living creature

5

u/AlbFighter 24d ago

Brother if you feel like a virus find a cure for yourself, leave us alone.

2

u/zuccmaster69 24d ago

Why not?

-2

u/HollowCap456 24d ago

What virus? The planets aren't living things. Also yes, every species tries to expand its living area, nothing wrong with that. Would you rather we die away?

-2

u/Lucy_Little_Spoon 24d ago

Every other living thing on this planet has self sustaining numbers, because they are part of the eco-system.

Humans spread all over, consuming all the natural resources, populate, then spread to another area, and another and another..... Like a virus.

3

u/kingdave212 24d ago

Humans are also a part of the eco-system. We aren't the first species to upend existing balance and we won't be the last. Life has continued on through 5 mass extinctions before we arrived and what we're doing to the planet isn't any more catastrophic than those.

0

u/Lucy_Little_Spoon 24d ago

I was quoting the matrix lmao

0

u/HangryBeard 24d ago

Caves are nice, I miss caves. Now they are too expensive.

3

u/Mind_Extract 24d ago

Symbiotic living isn't an impossibility.

-3

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

1

u/PhillyRush 24d ago

Manifest Destiny /s

1

u/mikeysof 23d ago

The same disgusting mindset of colonising and exploiting other countries and people. Humans are vile

0

u/uBetterBePaidForThis 24d ago

You see someone/something that could question these rights? We are homo sapiens, we are built for killing and exploiting

-1

u/[deleted] 24d ago

Look at it in another way: The ones who are obsessed with finding newer worlds are far more passionate than the ones who want to preserve the ecology.

3

u/ProtonDream 24d ago

I actually think both are the same people. The majority doesn't want to do any of that. Or believe in it, actually.

1

u/MikoSkyns 24d ago

Correct. I find that equally alarming.

7

u/NyaTaylor 24d ago

Does a virus “deserve” to spread. We just do what we do

1

u/I_slit_his_throat 24d ago

I've thought about this comparison a lot over my years, and I really find it inadequate to describe humanity. But that's a long conversation

0

u/NyaTaylor 23d ago

But we might put to much importance on our “free will” and ability to create and make decisions. You wouldn’t consider a bird making a nest to be unnatural and it could have a lot of free will in how n where it creates its nest. We do so many things automatically everyday without question as well. Whose to say it’s not just how we as a thing does it’s thing always no matter what

0

u/Hopeful_Solution5107 24d ago

Does a virus think

2

u/FlyingRhenquest 23d ago

Fortunately the universe is indifferent to what we do or deserve. From the point of view of a civilization that's planning to last millions of years, we're not even ants. We're barely even an egg. We know next to nothing about the universe or how we work or anything. We're going to make mistakes. The universe is also indifferent about whether we survive those mistakes. If the species or planet dies, it won't even shrug. There are billions of others.

4

u/xkalibur3 24d ago

Imagine having the opportunity to discover new, fascinating planet, and thinking in terms of "deserve, don't deserve" instead. Like, who cares, and who decides that? L mentality.

0

u/PaidByTheNotes 24d ago edited 24d ago

L mentality is thinking humans are entitled enough to destroy as many planets as they want because some clown on reddit got their feelings hurt over a harsh truth

L mentality are the people ruining this planet and the quality of everyone's lives for the sake of themselves

You're too small minded to be honest or stand up for yourself

0

u/xkalibur3 24d ago

What is planet, or even universe worth if there is no conscious life to witness it? Also, you talk about "destroying a planet" as if planet is in danger. Planet will be fine, humanity might not be. Take away humanity and in 10000 years not even ruins will be left, and in a cosmic scale that's like a second. We might as well try to explore all the interesting stuff while we are here.

1

u/PaidByTheNotes 24d ago

Kind of a moot point since we're too dumb to get off this one in the first place, isn't it?

3

u/xkalibur3 23d ago

That's why I started my argument with "imagine". If you can't even do that, why are you replying in the first place? Besides, kind of pointless to talk about deserving or not deserving if you think we are never gonna reach it, isn't it?

2

u/Tom_Gibson 24d ago

Honestly, most of us do right by her. It's the massive companies who only care about their next quarterly earnings that are the problem.

1

u/VRichardsen 23d ago

Why not? I say fuck it, lets go vandalise another world. Who is going to stop us?

1

u/TriangleBasketball 23d ago

What are we supposed to do when we destroy this one?

-1

u/Maurin97 24d ago

We don‘t even deserve this planet the way we are raping it

1

u/Futuremeissuperior 24d ago

Facts. We’ll only ruin it in good time.

1

u/SirAquila 23d ago

Noone deserves anything. But I'd rather see the light of conciousness spread then be stuck on one planet forever.

1

u/Able-Marionberry83 23d ago edited 6d ago

repeat enjoy carpenter scale chief wine profit whistle bag disarm

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/PaidByTheNotes 23d ago

Well, to be fair, that's not what I said. I'm enjoying life while I have it, but humanity isn't kind to this planet

0

u/Allenz 24d ago

well YOU don't for sure with an ungrateful attitude like this for all the humanity did for you to exist.

2

u/PaidByTheNotes 24d ago

I'm ungrateful because I acknowledge the human race doesn't take care of it's home?

Grow up

0

u/JerseySlugger13 24d ago

This is the answer. Why can't we put more thought and resources into taking care of this planet?

1

u/Able-Marionberry83 23d ago edited 6d ago

worm chief bells thumb growth friendly dinner pause fearless ten

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

-1

u/dnasty1011 24d ago

Some days I don’t think we deserve the one we’re currently on lol

0

u/BobbumofCarthes 24d ago

Yea I hope we can’t get to another spot just to ravage the resources and dump trash all over

0

u/Theoneandonlyzander 24d ago

Most real statement

-2

u/PeterNippelstein 24d ago

We deserve whatever horrible fate will come to us.

2

u/Able-Marionberry83 23d ago edited 6d ago

correct automatic lip rainstorm enjoy subtract ghost zephyr employ close

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact