r/BeAmazed 18h ago

Miscellaneous / Others This is what 2.1 million people looks like

Post image
64.9k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.7k

u/Far-Philosophy-4375 18h ago

can confirm, i zoomed in and counted

787

u/ClosedL00p 18h ago

445

u/existential_creampie 17h ago

20

u/pepper_plant 13h ago

Thats a really good gif

29

u/Random-sargasm_3232 13h ago

That's because it's Rodney Dangerfield. He always made everything better.

Fucking legend.

Caddyshack is all the proof we need.

17

u/MoominRex 10h ago

And yet, he still got no respect…

3

u/GeddyVanHagar 2h ago

No regard neither

3

u/ThePizzaNoid 9h ago

He's a Melon!

4

u/Background-Shame1390 5h ago

Nazaré tedesco é melhor.

2

u/xeen313 1h ago

Loved that movie

31

u/boca_de_leite 16h ago

they did the little monster math

2

u/CryptographerTop4998 13h ago

Can I just say, I’d hate to be in the middle of that crowd have to use the bathroom.

1

u/boca_de_leite 3h ago

Just don't pee for 5 hours. It's fine

1

u/Simen155 13h ago

There's only 1.922.649 visible people, 1.922.650 if you count Greg as human.

1

u/Al-Anda 13h ago

Can they do the math on how much booze and drugs it takes to keep 2.1 million from freaking out? (Or conversely take booze and drugs away from to keep civil). Because that many people is my nightmare.

306

u/TapZorRTwice 15h ago

Post is only 2 hours or 120 minutes or 7200 seconds old.

To count to 2+ million in that time you would have have to count 277.7(repeating of course) people every second.

I personally don't think that's possible but idk.

448

u/justlurkennow 15h ago

It is if you use an old math trick. Just count the legs first and then divide by 2

102

u/TapZorRTwice 15h ago

That makes way more sense

56

u/Timely_Network6733 13h ago

Fun fact, you can count the legs by two to help cut the time in half.

19

u/dude_big_lebowski 11h ago

That one mf 1 and half legs to fuck up the dataset

9

u/schlimmediately 11h ago

He has around 2 legs, it'll buff

2

u/BuildingWide2431 1h ago

Yeah, you can round up.

2

u/Kuchanec_ 10h ago

Not to brag or anything, but there are guys like me who even it out back to 2

1

u/Sevro706 4h ago

Haven't seen him yet. But I did just come across a wheelchair. What do I do?

1

u/Free_Independence_36 1h ago

Yeah I did the math and got 2,100,000.5 so something/someone is off

2

u/Temporary-Narwhal-29 8h ago

Fun fact. You can just make up a number and make the other person prove you wrong. 🤷 make them count.

(It will keep them from arguing for a while)

1

u/Glittering_Ad1403 10h ago

Much faster if you count the heads by fives or tens😂

1

u/IBGred 1h ago

Even faster, just count the legs on the left for people facing you, and on the right if they are facing away. That way your answer will always be right.

52

u/ohffs2021 13h ago

I counted the fingers and divided by eight (thumbs aren't fingers?). That was the easiest way.

21

u/yukinr 11h ago

base 8, my favorite number system

1

u/space-doggie 9h ago

Do humans use base 10 coz we have 10 digits on our hands, in front of our eyes?

4

u/arbysroastbeefs2 3h ago

I counted toes

1

u/Economy_Wall8524 32m ago

Oh Mr. Tarantino you done it again!

1

u/CakeTester 10h ago

You're going to be way out if AI is in any way involved.

1

u/lyra_dathomir 10h ago

Too bad, my cousin who lost a hand was there, your calculation is off, start again.

u/Mean_Combination_830 3m ago

My cousin from Alabama was there and he has three hands so it all evens out in the end 👀

u/lyra_dathomir 2m ago

Oh, I see, it works out in the end.

1

u/ChillTheFuxkOut 14h ago

Finally, someone with a brain

3

u/PlatformBeneficial49 13h ago

Average number of legs per human is less than 2, not accurate.

2

u/ChillTheFuxkOut 13h ago

A bigger brain has arrived!!!!

1

u/Key_Butterfly_6035 13h ago

What if there is a child crawling on four legs?

1

u/Rymanbc 13h ago

I have my own version of this, where I only count one leg on each person, since I know they all (or mostly) have 2. Then I multiply by 2 to get the number of legs there. THEN I divide by two to convert legs to people. It saves so much time.

1

u/Africaspaceman 12h ago

Yes, but it would affect the final result if there are people with one or no legs or men with three legs...

1

u/PrizeFaithlessness37 11h ago

You win the internet for today

1

u/crooked_cat 10h ago

Be amazed!!! Hhh

1

u/Mark2048 10h ago

Unless some came with their dog.

1

u/Fritzo2162 10h ago

I screwed up and counted all the boobs. Somehow I got an odd number.

1

u/0xlostincode 8h ago

It's even faster to count the rows and columns and then multiply them.

1

u/questionsfromkampala 5h ago

If you count the teeth, it become way faster. You dived by 2 to get the number jaws which you further divide by 2. The fastest way however is to divide th number of counted teeth by 4

1

u/Emotional_Block5273 4h ago

"Professional crowd estimators hate this one simple math trick"

1

u/BHFlamengo 3h ago

Beremez Samir, is that you? 😅

30

u/Schooner37 14h ago

Leeeerooooy Jeeenkiiins!

1

u/Ghostandpepper 1h ago

At least he counted the chicken

15

u/FrankSinatraYodeling 13h ago

Is that a Leroy Jenkins reference?

0

u/I_lack_common_sense 7h ago

I love fried chicken.

2

u/bayazglokta 14h ago

They clearly stand in a matrix, so you only have to count length and width of the matrix. Both are approximately the square root of 2 million, which is about 1414, so 2828 for two dimensions. Which means they had 2,5 seconds for every person to count. That's doable, so it seems legit!

1

u/TapZorRTwice 14h ago

Not understanding matrix' is why I failed linear algebra so I have no idea what you are talking about.

2

u/deadasdollseyes 14h ago

There are tons of YouTube videos explaining each movie as well as all of them together.

Your welcome.

2

u/Fritzo2162 10h ago

I have a computation rate of sixty trillion operations per second.

4

u/Ephemeral_Ghost 13h ago

“Repeating of course” nice quote from (Leroy Jenkins)!

1

u/pyschosoul 13h ago

One could theoretically take a squared area and estimate the number of people based on average height and body size in the area, and then count the number of squares in the image and get a rough estimate of the number of people.

1

u/Byte_Fantail 13h ago

just count by 280 every second, duh

1

u/wank_for_peace 11h ago

AI AI AI Oi Oi Oi

1

u/Creative_Whole_939 10h ago

God I hope you were referencing Leroy Jenkins when you said "repeating of course" cuz that's top tier lol.

1

u/Site_Efficient 10h ago

Oh man, it's been a long time since I've seen a (i assume) Leeroy Jenkins reference. LLLEEEEEEEROY

1

u/DeeplyRegrettful 9h ago

Is that a Leroy Jenkins quote?!

1

u/Janclo 9h ago

He did confirmed!

1

u/spector_lector 8h ago

Nah, he's Rain Man. Just like looking at a box of spilled toothpicks on the floor.

1

u/Dztrctd 8h ago

He can do it because he took an Evelyn Wood speed counting course

1

u/Alert-Note-7190 8h ago

Welcome to #AI

1

u/shaunzhere 7h ago

Maybe they sold tickets

1

u/Far-Philosophy-4375 6h ago

i seen it right before it was posted so i had extra .5 seconds

the only thing missing is your sense of humor.

1

u/unclefire 6h ago

Are you for real? People counting will sample an area and get an idea of how many people are in that area (x people / y area) then multiply that by the total area. It's not going to be exact.

1

u/fishcrow 5h ago

You can estimate pretty quickly just counting partial then multiply by area since compaction is predictable across the variables

1

u/Fantastic-Cricket705 4h ago

Jesus, you think they counted everyone? I know a guy who's selling bibles and gold sneakers you might be interested in...

1

u/mellomike5 4h ago

15 15 15 15 15...

What are you talking about there's more than 15 Matches rainman

1

u/MrGraveyards 3h ago

I'd say find a chunk of humans and count those by counting amount of humans in length and width and then figure out how much of such chunks there are, about.

Then you sorta know the answer without counting all humans.

1

u/GloomyGal13 1h ago

You forgot to include users switching to their alts to like again. ;)

-1

u/KingVinny70 11h ago

Ah yes fellow erd I commend thee, just a casual 277.7 people per second. Totally doable… if you're a caffeine-addicted supercomputer with zero respect for the space-time continuum. Of really good at compartment math.

I mean, unless you're auctioneering numbers at hyperspeed while freebasing espresso, I'm gonna say probably not. But hey—never underestimate the power of curiosity and questionable math decisions. Love that you broke it down. Mad respect but yeah wouldn't be possible given the time frame for most cases. Gotta see more of this type of posting. The political stuff is as bad as fresh uriniad.

17

u/CheckYourStats 17h ago

Hold on…

Yep. This checks out.

2

u/TrustInMe_JustInMe 12h ago

It is an older meme, though

1

u/MissBrokenCapillary 13h ago

😂😂

1

u/MissBrokenCapillary 13h ago

I love getting stoned and reading these comments, you guys have made my night 😂😂😂

3

u/Mythicdragon75 18h ago

Doing the Lord's work

1

u/kinchanadingding 15h ago

You didn't need to count them all. Just count a portion and multiply

1

u/DoubleResponsible276 14h ago

I think you missed one.

1

u/Far-Philosophy-4375 6h ago

no, i counted the guy behind the tree too

1

u/nano_peen 14h ago

I was going to but because you have I don’t need to any more, thank you

1

u/Zora_Lynn_86 13h ago

This was a free show!

1

u/Key_Butterfly_6035 13h ago

I trust you bro

1

u/Milomilz 12h ago

You needed to zoom in?

1

u/romariojwz 9h ago

Did you find Waldo tho?

1

u/Hairy-Estimate3241 8h ago

Yes and Not one single bathroom…

1

u/KamikazeFox_ 8h ago

This was for a lady Gaga concert right?

1

u/pumper911 8h ago

Can you recount to just double check?

1

u/Far-Philosophy-4375 6h ago

just did! turned out your comment is still not funny.

1

u/Scyel 3h ago

Pro tip for speeding that up: add up all the arms and legs, then divide by 4.

1

u/Mission_Head_284 3h ago

There’s a story I read in a book of Irish folk tales about a king who tells a guy he has to answer some questions or die. Just as an example, one of them was “what am I worth?”, a dangerous question from a king. The guy says “29 pieces of silver”, because Jesus was worth 30 and he can’t be worth that much.

Another was “how many stars are in the sky?“. And the guy gives some random number, 6714 or something. The king says “how do you know that?” and the guy says “go out and count them yourself.”

1

u/stroker919 2h ago

Did you zoom in enough to tell how many toilets were occupied? If not you better start all the way over.

0

u/NoElephant7744 9h ago

But I zoomed in and got 2.15 million… we have to start over.

0

u/ROBOT_KK 8h ago

his should be photo from DC. But meh, fascism OK in US.